It appears to me that Aqulung1000 has an eye sight problem. Aside from his brain's tendency to only see what his close mind chooses, it's clear that he has a major eye sight problem.

Personally I'm a big believer in embodying and underling for dramatic effect. But ALL THE TIME???? The only viable reason is that he cannot clearly see his own comments, which gives him MAJOR difficult in reading other clipper's comments. He has a number of choices aside from the obvious one - that he clearly has already rejected - of have an eye test. Given his clear demonstration for rational thought, another solution might be the next best alternative. Go bother another site!!! Wait he probably can not re...

It appears to me that Aqulung1000 has an eye sight problem. Aside from his brain's tendency to only see what his close mind chooses, it's clear that he has a major eye sight problem.

Personally I'm a big believer in embodying and underling for dramatic effect. But ALL THE TIME???? The only viable reason is that he cannot clearly see his own comments, which gives him MAJOR difficult in reading other clipper's comments. He has a number of choices aside from the obvious one - that he clearly has already rejected - of have an eye test. Given his clear demonstration for rational thought, another solution might be the next best alternative. Go bother another site!!! Wait he probably can not read this so just for him...

Personally I'm a big believer in embodying and underling for dramatic effect. But ALL THE TIME???? The only viable reason is that he cannot clearly see his own comments, which gives him MAJOR difficult in reading other clipper's comments. He has a number of choices aside from the obvious one - that he clearly has already rejected - of have an eye test. Given his clear demonstration for rational thought, another solution might be the next best alternative. GO BOTHER ANOTHER SITE!!!

Have you had that eye test? No obviously. Still emboldening EVERYTHING, and not very well.

Hey ratcatcher2, you are new here and it seems that you are a little bit insecure. You attack me because I use the Text Editor. This is what you should have learned in grade school, not to mention your lack of manners.

Do you get ANYTHING correct, ever?

I'm righthand - with more than 900 followers - as well as ratcatcher2.

You ABUSE the Text Editor.

I'm Irish , so we do not have grade school. I'll put my privileged school record up against yours any day and GUARANTEE that I'll come out on top.

You are on the wrong side of the Atlantic to discuss manners. I'd trust your country me...

Have you had that eye test? No obviously. Still emboldening EVERYTHING, and not very well.

Hey ratcatcher2, you are new here and it seems that you are a little bit insecure. You attack me because I use the Text Editor. This is what you should have learned in grade school, not to mention your lack of manners.

Do you get ANYTHING correct, ever?

I'm righthand - with more than 900 followers - as well as ratcatcher2.

You ABUSE the Text Editor.

I'm Irish , so we do not have grade school. I'll put my privileged school record up against yours any day and GUARANTEE that I'll come out on top.

You are on the wrong side of the Atlantic to discuss manners. I'd trust your country men would not put forward a buffoon to compete in manners.

Try a little research next time before blundering in where you are clearly blindsided.

See, that proves that his eyesight is defective or he has an inability to read. This tired false was answered here recently.
Haaretz: "Why should Hamas recognise Israel?"

fta
The economic siege on the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the targeted killings, the raids and checkpoints can be explained as an Israeli defence against terror attacks. But how can one explain the doubling of the number of settlers in the West Bank and Jerusalem since the Madrid conference and Oslo agreement? Since the 1996 elections in Israel, and almost through the end of Ehud Barak's government, there was quite a long period of quiet on the securit...

See, that proves that his eyesight is defective or he has an inability to read. This tired false was answered here recently.
Haaretz: "Why should Hamas recognise Israel?"

fta
The economic siege on the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the targeted killings, the raids and checkpoints can be explained as an Israeli defence against terror attacks. But how can one explain the doubling of the number of settlers in the West Bank and Jerusalem since the Madrid conference and Oslo agreement? Since the 1996 elections in Israel, and almost through the end of Ehud Barak's government, there was quite a long period of quiet on the security front. There were almost no terror attacks. During that period, as before, the great momentum of settlement continued. The population of settlers grew from 100,000 to over 200,000 during the 1990s.

When the Israelis build large new neighborhoods in East Jerusalem, expand the neighborhoods and settlements in the Muslim part of the Old City, in Silwan, Ras al-Amud and Sheikh Jarrah, expel Arabs from the city and surround them with tens of thousands of Jewish settlers in a tight belt from Upper Beitar in the south, via Ma'ale Adumim in the east and Givat Ze'ev in the north - this conveys a clear message: There is no chance that the capital of the Palestinian state will be established anywhere in Jerusalem. If you add to this the growth of settlements in Samaria, Ariel, the suburbs of Ramallah, in an expanded Gush Etzion and Mount Hebron, the Israeli message becomes unequivocal: You Palestinians have no chance. You recognized Israel and what you received in return was the liquidation of your national hopes. So why should Hamas repeat the same recognition whose results we have already seen?
... Haaretz Oct 2006


Basically a Jew saying don't trust us Jews that they lie. Note this was in Oct 2006. How much wor