Aren't we exactly 0[where we were in 2004 on?
It remains, as it was, that the intentions of the political-Islamist mullahs of Iran cannot be trusted to develop a nuclear program of ANY kind. It matters NOT whether there is known to be development related strictly to weapons. It seems to me that evidence of a direct path to weapons was a mystery then, as now, but that was not the #1 issue then, as it SHOULD NOT be now.
The deal has been modulated away from the first hard line. That Iran can't be allowed to have free reign with uranium enrichment of any kind and it must cease. Whether or not there is a current active weapons specific program right now.

The new report does not/should not make those on the Iran-nuke watch appear stupid.
What does make them look stupid is that they have allowed "popular" view to regard them as stupid and shift the debate from where it really started.
THAT makes them look stupid.
And just as Bush has been terrible at expressing the (any) message to the country and the world, so has become, it seems, anyone involved in stating the message for the U.S.A., if not the whole Western world.