I think you were looking for ≠.

You mean like UV were probably looking for that too?
I don't trust the motivation of anyone who would promote this beyond the exact value of seeking out the reasons FOR "delinquency".
If their motivation is solely an interest in freeing "early sex" from responsibility for delinquency, then they,themselves, are part of the problem.
I think it is accepted that early sex is at least as often one of the symptoms as it is a cause.
What value in further promoting this is there but to promote early sex?

davboz: That's like saying studying the effects of tobacco smoke and finding results that are positive is promoting smoking. In the research field of psychology, it's irresponsible to NOT publish new findings. Also, if a research team and their founders spent thousands of $ on this project (as it likely could have cost), why on earth would they not publish it, just to satisfy up-tight conservatives such as yourself?