Clipmarks
kelsoweikalfollowshare
8-11-2009 11:45 AM
208 views
4 Comments   | Add a Comment
8-11-2009 5:05 PM
debbyski
8-11-2009 8:37 PM
bignosemousie
But that ickiness has nothing to do with the idea of children holding up fake babies to their nonexistent breasts and pretending to feed them
Kids don't need a special doll to imitate breastfeeding. They can do it with any doll, and some kids do. I don't see pretending to breastfeed a baby doll as anything gross or creepy. However, giving kids fake breasts? seems weird. They have breasts already, just not developed ones.
8-11-2009 8:43 PM
kelsoweikal
OOPS! You're exactly right BNM ... I failed to get the rest of the clip on here!

Here it is!

If your child wants to mimic the act of breast-feeding, a lifted shirt and a regular doll (or a stuffed lion, a wooden spoon, or whatever happens to be handy) will do the trick nicely. One of the great advantages of breast-feeding, often trumpeted by its champions, is that unlike bottle-feeding, it’s free (if you don’t count the opportunity cost of missed work time, etc.). Why pay 44 euros (around $55) so that your kid can pretend to save money—and pretend, against all evidence, that human milk is expressed through appliquéd daisies?

Though the Glutton is a European-made doll, her conceptual roots...
8-11-2009 8:45 PM
kelsoweikal
In other words, kids don't need all this ridiculous crap to grow up healthy and happy and learn about being a well-adjusted adult!

The icky part is when people buy into the erroneous belief that they need this kind of junk!
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK